Assuming for the sake of argument that the Critical Legal Studies definition that "Reification" is an illegitimate process whereby "an abstract concept is treated as if it is concrete or real," is a valid definition, we can see that the term "theosphany" is clearly an illegitimate reified concept. There is no real definition of "theosphany" at all. In fact, "theosphany" seems to be an illegal use of sophistry in violatin of Sheriff's Law. Opus Dei-Al Queda, stupid henchmen, are using the term "theosphany" in an attempt to illegally and immorally stop persons from reasonable doing such things as: Celebrating Christmas, eating chocolate, having a beer or a glass of wine, doing well in school, believing in the American Constitution, believing in the Declaration of Independence, etc. Any person who uses the term "theosphany" in an attempt to persecute another, should be thrown in jail for violating Sheriff's Law, the Law of Logic.
(C)Perpetual Copyright (2011) by Anthony J. Fejfar and Anthony J. Faber, and
Neothomism, P.C., (PA)
No comments:
Post a Comment